Incandescent bulbs are out, more efficient options are in. Find out how a small change can make a big difference on your energy bill.
In
January, the Energy Independence Security Act began phasing out
production of general-purpose incandescent bulbs, starting with 100-watt
bulbs. Exceptions will be made for some incandescent, however, including 3-way, appliance, and ceiling fan bulbs. Fortunately,
the alternatives are more energy efficient, better for the environment
and provide similar - or better - light quality.
LED LIGHTS
Cost: Estimated
cost per year is $1.58 compared to $7.90 for a 60-watt incandescent
bulb (there are currently no 100-watt equivalent LED bulbs on the
market).
Life: 25,000 hours
Pros: Most energy efficient and long lasting. Many dimmable options. Instant on. No mercury. Great for hard-to-reach locations.
Cons: Costs more to purchase, but you make up for it in energy savings over the life of the bulb. Technology is still evolving.
COMPACT FLORESCENT
Cost: Estimated
cost per year is $3.42 compared to $13.17 for a 100-watt incandescent
bulb.
Life:
10,000 hours
Pros:
Most cost-effective, energy saving option. Produces low heat. Many color temperature options are available.
Cons: Contains mercury. Requires safe disposal. Most models are not dimmable (check packages).
HALOGEN
Cost: Estimated
cost per year is $9.48 compared to $13.17 for a 100-watt incandescent
bulb.
Life: 1,000 hours
Pros: Produces highest light quality. More efficient than incandescent bulbs, while delivering similar performance.
Cons: High heat. Not as energy efficient as CFL or LED.
Courtesy of Lowe’s Creative Ideas for Home and Gardens